6 Comments
User's avatar
anb's avatar

While looking up family members in a rural town (though with factory employment nearby), I noticed that many people on the page were listed as "lodgers". I wondered if that meant the counted individual rented a room in a house or if the census considered apartment dwellers lodgers as well?

Expand full comment
The Civic Librarian's avatar

That's a great question! You can probably find some interesting research on History Hub (forum through NARA), or even ask it yourself! https://historyhub.history.gov/welcome

I just did a quick search for "lodger" - and for example, I found this post that mentions about lodging/boarding houses in the 1910 Census: https://historyhub.history.gov/community/genealogy/census-records/blog/2020/10/06/census-fun-fact-2-fictional-names-just-call-me-another-time. I'll definitely be investigating this further!

Expand full comment
Joan DeMartin's avatar

Oooo, thank you! And a new resource (for me) too!

Expand full comment
Joan DeMartin's avatar

Interesting question!

Expand full comment
Joan DeMartin's avatar

Thanks for the shout-out, Audrey! This is yet another fascinating post. Is there a delay in releasing all census records?

Expand full comment
The Civic Librarian's avatar

Great question, Joan! The 72 year-old rule pertains specifically to access restrictions on personally identifiable information in Census decennial records. I don't think I linked to this page in the newsletter (it would've been useful if I had!), but check out this information page on Census.gov: https://www.census.gov/history/www/genealogy/decennial_census_records/the_72_year_rule_1.html.

From this page: "The U.S. government will not release personally identifiable information about an individual to any other individual or agency until 72 years after it was collected for the decennial census. This "72-Year Rule" (92 Stat. 915; Public Law 95-416; October 5, 1978) restricts access to decennial census records to all but the individual named on the record or their legal heir."

Expand full comment